An auto insurer pays a $50,000 collision claim and pursues subrogation against the at-fault driver. The insured's total damages were $80,000, but only $50,000 was covered under the policy (the insured was underinsured). The insurer relies on equitable subrogation, not on a policy clause. Under Texas law, what must happen before the insurer can collect any subrogation recovery?
Correct
The answer is A: The insured must recover all $80,000 before the insurer gets anything
Texas applies the made-whole doctrine to equitable subrogation: an insurer is not entitled to subrogation if the insured's loss is greater than what the insured has recovered from the insurer and the at-fault party together (Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Ins. Co., Tex. 1980). Counting the $50,000 the insurer paid, the insured is still $30,000 short of the $80,000 loss, so the first $30,000 recovered from the at-fault driver goes to the insured, and the insurer takes only what is left, up to its $50,000. The doctrine is a default rule, though. When the policy gives the insurer a clear and specific contractual right of subrogation, Texas enforces the contract and the made-whole doctrine does not apply (Fortis Benefits v. Cantu, Tex. 2007), and for health-plan payors Civil Practice and Remedies Code §140.005(d) bars it by statute.
Why not ?
Source: Civil Practice and Remedies Code §140.005(d)
Show the answer
The answer is A: The insured must recover all $80,000 before the insurer gets anything
Texas applies the made-whole doctrine to equitable subrogation: an insurer is not entitled to subrogation if the insured's loss is greater than what the insured has recovered from the insurer and the at-fault party together (Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Ins. Co., Tex. 1980). Counting the $50,000 the insurer paid, the insured is still $30,000 short of the $80,000 loss, so the first $30,000 recovered from the at-fault driver goes to the insured, and the insurer takes only what is left, up to its $50,000. The doctrine is a default rule, though. When the policy gives the insurer a clear and specific contractual right of subrogation, Texas enforces the contract and the made-whole doctrine does not apply (Fortis Benefits v. Cantu, Tex. 2007), and for health-plan payors Civil Practice and Remedies Code §140.005(d) bars it by statute.
Source: Civil Practice and Remedies Code §140.005(d)