Pennsylvania Property & Casualty (PA-PC) · Chapter 5

Commercial General Liability & Commercial Automobile

4 practice questions from the 77 in this chapter of StudyWren Insurance. Pick an answer and check it to see the explanation.

Commercial General Liability & Commercial Automobile PA-PC-05-308

A Pennsylvania manufacturing company purchases a Commercial General Liability policy with an occurrence trigger. During the policy period, a faulty valve manufactured by the company fails, causing property damage to a customer's equipment. The customer files a claim 18 months after the policy has expired. Which statement is correct regarding coverage under the occurrence-form CGL policy?

Show the answer

The answer is A: Coverage applies because the faulty valve failure (occurrence) happened during the policy period.

Under an occurrence-form CGL, coverage is triggered by bodily injury or property damage that happens during the policy period, no matter when the claim is made. The valve failed and damaged the customer's equipment while the policy was in force, so the policy responds even though the claim came 18 months after expiration. Asking when the claim was filed is claims-made thinking, and extended reporting periods exist only for claims-made forms. The products-completed operations hazard is part of the standard occurrence form, not excluded from it.

Reviewed in our October 2026 Pennsylvania fact-check.

Report a problem with this question

Commercial General Liability & Commercial Automobile PA-PC-05-356

A Pennsylvania for-hire trucking company hauls general (nonhazardous) freight in interstate commerce in trucks of 10,001 pounds or more, and its commercial auto policy includes the MCS-90 endorsement. A truck causes an accident that the policy's own terms do not cover, and the injured party obtains a final judgment of $800,000 for property damage against the carrier. Which statement describes what the MCS-90 does?

Show the answer

The answer is A: The insurer must pay the judgment up to the $750,000 federal minimum, then may seek reimbursement from the carrier.

The MCS-90 obligates the insurer to pay a final judgment against the motor carrier for public liability, up to the federal minimum, even where the policy's own terms would not cover the accident. For for-hire interstate carriers of nonhazardous property over 10,000 pounds the minimum is $750,000 (49 CFR 387.9), so the insurer pays $750,000 of the $800,000 judgment, and the carrier bears the rest. The insurer may then seek reimbursement from the carrier for what the policy would not have paid. The endorsement does not remove limits above the minimum and it covers property damage as well as bodily injury, though not cargo or the carrier's employees.

Source: 49 CFR 387.9

Report a problem with this question

Commercial General Liability & Commercial Automobile PA-PC-05-361

A Pennsylvania motor carrier hauls nonhazardous freight for hire in interstate commerce in trucks rated over 10,000 pounds. Its Commercial Auto policy has a $500,000 combined single limit and carries the MCS-90 endorsement. The carrier's truck causes an accident, and a third party wins a $1,000,000 final judgment for property damage. Which statement is correct about the MCS-90?

Show the answer

The answer is C: The insurer pays $750,000: the $500,000 policy limit plus $250,000 under the MCS-90, which the carrier must reimburse.

The MCS-90 guarantees the public a final judgment for public liability (bodily injury, property damage and environmental restoration) up to the federal minimum. For for-hire nonhazardous freight in a vehicle of 10,001 pounds or more, that minimum is $750,000 (49 CFR 387.9). The policy pays its own $500,000 limit, and the endorsement fills the gap up to $750,000, so the insurer pays $750,000. The endorsement is not unlimited. Because the policy would not have paid the extra $250,000 without the endorsement, the carrier must reimburse the insurer. The carrier remains responsible for the $250,000 of the judgment above the federal minimum.

Source: 49 CFR 387.9

Report a problem with this question

Commercial General Liability & Commercial Automobile PA-PC-05-379

A Pennsylvania for-hire trucking company, hauling in interstate commerce in trucks rated over 10,000 pounds, purchases a Commercial Automobile policy with liability coverage and the Motor Carrier Endorsement (MCS-90). While transporting general commodities, one of its trucks is involved in an accident that causes $900,000 in property damage. The company’s policy limits are $750,000. Under the MCS-90 endorsement, which statement correctly describes the insurer’s financial responsibility?

Show the answer

The answer is A: The insurer pays its $750,000 limit; the MCS-90 adds nothing because $750,000 is the federal minimum, so the carrier owes the other $150,000.

The MCS-90 guarantees payment of a public liability judgment up to the federal minimum for the carrier's cargo. For a for-hire carrier of nonhazardous general commodities in a vehicle of 10,001 pounds or more, that minimum is $750,000 (49 CFR 387.9). The policy already has a $750,000 limit, so the endorsement adds nothing, and the insurer pays $750,000. The trucking company is responsible for the remaining $150,000. Higher minimums, such as $1,000,000, apply only to listed hazardous materials and oil.

Source: 49 CFR 387.9

Report a problem with this question

Keep going in the app

All 77 questions in this chapter, paced to your exam date, with a forecast of your score.

Coming soon to the App Store