A homeowner's primary residence is a total loss, and the insurer notifies the homeowner that it will not renew the residential property policy. According to California Insurance Code §675.1, under what specific condition must the insurer instead offer to renew the policy?
Correct
The answer is B: The insurer must offer to renew if a disaster caused the total loss and the insured was not also negligent.
Insurance Code §675.1(a)(3) applies to a total loss of the primary insured structure under a residential property policy. If a disaster caused the loss (an earthquake, fire, storm or similar sudden catastrophe for which a state of emergency or local emergency has been declared, as defined by reference to Civil Code §1689.14) and the loss was not also due to the insured's negligence, the insurer must offer to renew for at least the next two annual renewal periods and no less than 24 months of coverage from the date of loss. The renewal adjusts limits, coverages and premium to the insured's changed exposure after consultation (§675.1(a)(1)). The duty gives way to a §676 ground such as nonpayment or fraud, and to later losses that make the property uninsurable. The statute does not require the insured to rebuild on the same parcel.
Why not ?
Reviewed in our October 2026 California fact-check.
Show the answer
The answer is B: The insurer must offer to renew if a disaster caused the total loss and the insured was not also negligent.
Insurance Code §675.1(a)(3) applies to a total loss of the primary insured structure under a residential property policy. If a disaster caused the loss (an earthquake, fire, storm or similar sudden catastrophe for which a state of emergency or local emergency has been declared, as defined by reference to Civil Code §1689.14) and the loss was not also due to the insured's negligence, the insurer must offer to renew for at least the next two annual renewal periods and no less than 24 months of coverage from the date of loss. The renewal adjusts limits, coverages and premium to the insured's changed exposure after consultation (§675.1(a)(1)). The duty gives way to a §676 ground such as nonpayment or fraud, and to later losses that make the property uninsurable. The statute does not require the insured to rebuild on the same parcel.
Reviewed in our October 2026 California fact-check.